Miniature architecture proliferated in China during 1000-1200 CE. Buddhist and Daoist icons were sheltered by mini wooden pavilions, holy scriptures were stored in architectural-shaped bookcases and cabinets, whereas the interior of a...
moreMiniature architecture proliferated in China during 1000-1200 CE. Buddhist and Daoist icons were sheltered by mini wooden pavilions, holy scriptures were stored in architectural-shaped bookcases and cabinets, whereas the interior of a worship hall--especially the vaulted ceiling--was typically ornamented with groups of tiny buildings to represent the “heavenly palace.” Specifications of miniature-making have been written into the official building standards, Yingzao fashi, promulgated in 1103 by the Northern Song imperial court. However, even though a few of these miniatures have been discussed by scholars on separate occasions, in general, miniature architecture has never received the systematic survey it deserves. Miniaturization as a culturally significant form of artistic creation, too, appears to have slipped most scholars’ attention. In fact, as my dissertation demonstrates, a critical understanding of miniatures helps to positively reshape our premises and conclusions about architecture, art, and material culture. The development of Chinese architecture from the tenth century onward could be described as a history of “progressive miniaturization”: as key structural members and ornamental elements dwindled in size and scale over time, the overall form and structure of wooden architecture also underwent drastic changes.
A major concern of this dissertation is the practical, spiritual, and aesthetic reasons behind the fervor of miniature-making: what qualities made these small objects particularly appealing to people? My study reveals that religion, especially Mahayana Buddhism, played a central role in the proliferation of Chinese miniatures. I argue that the Buddhist worldview of the universe being a recursive, self-multiplying system of “worlds-within-worlds,” a concept that resonates with William Blake’s poetic imagination of “a world in a grain of sand,” has been translated into distinctive motifs of art by means of miniaturization. The decrease in size allowed a much detailed display within a limited space; it signaled the uncanny, the illusory, and the sublime, which helped to convey abstract Buddhist tenets and assist one’s visualization of a transcendental realm beyond the everyday experience. Since visualization was a key step of reaching Buddhahood, miniatures assumed liturgical as well as soteriological functions. For both elites and commoners, they became all-important symbols of spiritual power and “expedient means” of obtaining enlightenment and salvation.
Another important question is: what historical and social factors stimulated the flourishing of miniature architecture? I propose that on the one hand, it was due to the high standardization of Chinese architecture in the eleventh century. This standardization greatly facilitated miniature-making, because carpenters only had to reduce the size of the standard timber material while the same set of rules and formulas for large buildings would still apply. On the other hand, since miniatures were never the main targets of sumptuary laws, they granted carpenters much freedom to execute their ideas and showcase their skills. With the installation of increasingly stricter statutes on building activities, it was often safer and more economic to invest in miniatures than in large structures to achieve similar levels of impressiveness and feelings of importance. The trend of miniaturization was also observed in painting, sculpture, masonry, ceramics, and cabinetry; it became a hallmark of the material culture of twelfth-century China and endured well into later centuries.